|
Another factor that made cast:stream attractive to Adobe was the cost of ownership. Since cast:stream is available as a product, the return on investment (ROI) was extremely attractive when compared to existing monthly service-based solutions.
But in addition to being more expensive, Adobe's alternatives had hidden costs for audio conferencing -- which add up quickly over time. And for international customers, the long-distance phone bills for an in-depth briefing was just prohibitive.
With cast:stream Adobe doesn't get penalized for using their system. There is no meter running or audio conferencing charge so Adobe can use as often as they desire with no additional cost or budgetary surprises.
To view an example of an archived Adobe seminar click here (requires the cast:stream Player to be installed).
|